Full Swing KIT vs Rapsodo CLM PRO
Rapsodo CLM PRO is the cheaper unit by $1,499. Rapsodo CLM PRO needs less room depth (12 ft vs 18 ft).
Swap a side:vs
Reasons to pick Full Swing KIT
- Officially supports GSPro and E6 Connect (the other doesn't)
- Usable outdoors too
Reasons to pick Rapsodo CLM PRO
- Costs $1,499 less up front ($3,500 vs $4,999)
- Needs 6 ft less room depth (12 ft vs 18 ft)
| Full Swing KIT | Rapsodo CLM PRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $4,999 | ✓$3,500 |
| Tracking tech | Radar (doppler) | Camera (photometric) |
| Placement | Behind the golfer | Ceiling mounted |
| Min ceiling | 9 ft | 9 ft |
| Min depth | 18 ft | ✓12 ft |
| Indoor/outdoor | both | indoor |
| Ball requirements | any | any |
| Measured data | ✓16 — carry distance, total distance, spin rate, spin axis, face angle, face to path, attack angle, launch angle, ball speed, club speed, smash factor, club path, horizontal angle, apex height, side carry distance, side total distance | 6 — ball speed, launch angle, launch direction, spin rate, spin axis, club data |
| Sim software | Full Swing Golf, GSPro, E6 Connect | Rapsodo PC Simulation Software |
| Sim platforms | ✓GSPro, E6 Connect | — |
| Subscription | Full Swing Golf for KIT (Studio packages) requires a subscription; GSPro and E6 Connect are separate purchases with no subscription noted | Subscription model expected; six-camera overhead unit announced for 9-ft ceilings |
| Verdict | Tiger-endorsed radar with a slick OLED screen, officially on GSPro's list — competes with the R50 in the prosumer band. | NOT YET RELEASED — shown as a prototype at the 2026 PGA Show. Rapsodo has published no product page, specs or pricing; every figure here is an unconfirmed estimate. Do not buy on these numbers. |
✓ marks the better value on rankable specs (lower price, fits smaller rooms, more measured data, no required subscription). Greyed rows are identical.
Some links on this page are affiliate links. If you buy through them we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. We are not paid for placement or rankings — specs and verdicts are editorially independent.