Bushnell LPi vs Uneekor QED

Bushnell LPi is the cheaper unit by $5,501.

Swap a side:vs

Reasons to pick Bushnell LPi

  • Costs $6,251 less over 3 years with required subscriptions counted ($2,096 vs $8,347)
  • Officially supports FSX Play / FSX 2020 (the other doesn't)

Reasons to pick Uneekor QED

No clear edge over the Bushnell LPi on the specs we track — see the table for the finer differences.

Bushnell LPiUneekor QED
Price$1,499$7,000
Tracking techCamera (photometric)Camera (photometric)
PlacementBeside the ballCeiling mounted
Min ceiling9 ft9 ft
Min depth12 ft12 ft
Indoor/outdoorindoorindoor
Ball requirementsanymarked balls indoors
Measured data17 — Carry Distance, Ball Speed, Total Spin, Launch Angle (Vertical), Horizontal Launch Angle, Spin Tilt Axis, Back Spin, Side Spin, Ball Apex, Ball Descent Angle, Ball Offline, Ball Curve, Hangtime, Club Head Speed, Smash Factor, Club Path (In/Out), Angle of Attack5 — ball speed, launch, spin (marked ball), club data, impact video
Sim softwareFSX Play, FSX Pro, GSPro, E6 ConnectGSPro, E6 Connect, Creative Golf, ProTee Play, TGC 2019
Sim platformsGSPro, E6 Connect, FSX Play / FSX 2020GSPro, E6 Connect
SubscriptionBall & club data require a software subscription. Silver tier $199/yr, Gold tier $499/yr. GSPro subscription $250/yr. 14-day free trial of Gold included.Player Package included (free); Pro $199/yr, Champion $399/yr, Ultimate $599/yr. Third-party software requires Pro Package or above.
VerdictIndoor-only baby Launch Pro — undercuts SkyTrak+ on price, same subscription caveat.Effectively end-of-life — Uneekor now lists no price and offers only a trade-in. Buy the EYE XO/XO2 instead; kept here for used-market and comparison reference.

marks the better value on rankable specs (lower price, fits smaller rooms, more measured data, no required subscription). Greyed rows are identical.

Some links on this page are affiliate links. If you buy through them we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. We are not paid for placement or rankings — specs and verdicts are editorially independent.